Problem
The clean July 22 comparison (0c9b329a, zig-gc 88ea2543) exposes a severe object-churn scaling failure while the other nine workloads still beat JSC at eight warmed contexts. zig-js moves from 114.636 ms at one warmed lane to 3,548.104 ms at eight lanes (0.26x throughput scaling); system JSC moves from 122.697 ms to 195.609 ms (5.02x). The cold eight-lane row is similarly 3,438.036 ms versus 198.845 ms.
This is not directly comparable to the July 17 dependency/toolchain state, but it is the current user-visible bottleneck and dominates the aggregate regression.
Acceptance
Problem
The clean July 22 comparison (
0c9b329a, zig-gc88ea2543) exposes a severe object-churn scaling failure while the other nine workloads still beat JSC at eight warmed contexts. zig-js moves from 114.636 ms at one warmed lane to 3,548.104 ms at eight lanes (0.26x throughput scaling); system JSC moves from 122.697 ms to 195.609 ms (5.02x). The cold eight-lane row is similarly 3,438.036 ms versus 198.845 ms.This is not directly comparable to the July 17 dependency/toolchain state, but it is the current user-visible bottleneck and dominates the aggregate regression.
Acceptance