Skip to content

Refine listed non-IDM tests to single owner - #9149

Merged
bouwkast merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
steven/codeowners-9
Sep 4, 2026
Merged

Refine listed non-IDM tests to single owner#9149
bouwkast merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
steven/codeowners-9

Conversation

@bouwkast

@bouwkast bouwkast commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary of changes

This goes through the NON-IDM tests already listed in CODEOWNERs and removes teams to ensure that there is a single "owner" team. tracing-dotnet is migrating to a "reviewer" team.

Reason for change

For tests we want a single owning team that gets reported for proper green CI reporting.

Implementation details

I deleted team from each line

It isn't much, I'd recommend going through line by line here and gut checking my changes some I just did on "vibes"

Test coverage

🤷

Other details

@bouwkast
bouwkast requested a review from a team as a code owner August 28, 2026 14:30
@andrewlock andrewlock added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label Aug 28, 2026
andrewlock
andrewlock approved these changes Aug 28, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS Outdated
Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS Outdated
Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS Outdated
Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS Outdated
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Aug 28, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-09-01 13:29:08

Comparing candidate commit 1c89993 in PR branch steven/codeowners-9 with baseline commit 1fc3a46 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 69 known flaky benchmarks, 57 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-6336.346op/s; -5205.788op/s] or [-7.233%; -5.943%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-16207.468op/s; -10335.419op/s] or [-9.257%; -5.903%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-13375.392op/s; -8287.345op/s] or [-9.123%; -5.652%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-32325.488op/s; -23719.641op/s] or [-18.804%; -13.798%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-8058.100op/s; -7608.193op/s] or [-9.555%; -9.021%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-17228.098op/s; -11028.853op/s] or [-17.517%; -11.214%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.573KB; +1.573KB] or [+47.789%; +47.804%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+308.432ms; +311.976ms] or [+153.055%; +154.813%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-57.826op/s; -53.105op/s] or [-10.404%; -9.555%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.010KB; +1.010KB] or [+37.448%; +37.460%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+367.866ms; +373.248ms] or [+290.637%; +294.889%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+70.405op/s; +73.560op/s] or [+9.283%; +9.699%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.088KB; +1.088KB] or [+40.343%; +40.355%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+401.119ms; +403.321ms] or [+354.975%; +356.924%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.725KB; +4.725KB] or [+99.465%; +99.482%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-61261.504op/s; -60810.569op/s] or [-47.665%; -47.314%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.848KB; +3.848KB] or [+81.379%; +81.391%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.858ms; -11.277ms] or [-7.406%; -5.267%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-60511.273op/s; -57672.410op/s] or [-44.170%; -42.098%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.576KB; +4.576KB] or [+98.954%; +98.966%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-48881.752op/s; -46638.151op/s] or [-44.195%; -42.166%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.348KB; +1.348KB] or [+109.063%; +109.078%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-297460.533op/s; -293878.249op/s] or [-30.372%; -30.006%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+511 bytes; +512 bytes] or [+41.822%; +41.834%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.162ms; -19.795ms] or [-11.667%; -8.828%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-125841.241op/s; -99050.087op/s] or [-13.444%; -10.582%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.312KB; +1.312KB] or [+108.600%; +108.616%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-161193.086op/s; -145240.719op/s] or [-23.160%; -20.868%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72593.136op/s; -71811.700op/s] or [-48.854%; -48.328%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-73233.213op/s; -70175.706op/s] or [-46.597%; -44.652%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-56396.169op/s; -53774.034op/s] or [-44.927%; -42.838%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+293021.892op/s; +323659.363op/s] or [+9.771%; +10.792%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-18.697ms; -14.365ms] or [-8.618%; -6.622%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.756KB] or [-42.324%; -42.316%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.623ms; +301.327ms] or [+150.211%; +150.563%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+940.158op/s; +990.947op/s] or [+10.384%; +10.945%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.518ms; +303.709ms] or [+151.552%; +153.161%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2409.933op/s; +2622.139op/s] or [+18.432%; +20.055%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.341ms; +302.744ms] or [+151.288%; +152.499%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1813.312op/s; +1941.545op/s] or [+17.507%; +18.745%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+295.006ms; +296.034ms] or [+144.895%; +145.400%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+564.031op/s; +572.681op/s] or [+14.953%; +15.182%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+294.941ms; +297.707ms] or [+144.186%; +145.538%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2704.530op/s; +2759.266op/s] or [+39.292%; +40.087%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.339ms; +300.053ms] or [+149.609%; +149.966%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1449.800op/s; +1472.011op/s] or [+28.777%; +29.218%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-148.187µs; -144.253µs] or [-30.425%; -29.617%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+868.276op/s; +894.377op/s] or [+42.289%; +43.560%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-136.371µs; -109.607µs] or [-31.277%; -25.139%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+833.546op/s; +958.017op/s] or [+36.239%; +41.651%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-144.201µs; -122.179µs] or [-30.895%; -26.177%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+790.649op/s; +873.992op/s] or [+36.498%; +40.345%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-128.598µs; -124.122µs] or [-34.721%; -33.512%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1372.732op/s; +1426.890op/s] or [+50.840%; +52.845%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-100.480µs; -76.779µs] or [-32.078%; -24.512%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1143.745op/s; +1349.745op/s] or [+35.654%; +42.076%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-138.923µs; -116.533µs] or [-38.004%; -31.879%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1350.551op/s; +1487.661op/s] or [+48.466%; +53.386%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.980ms; +300.697ms] or [+149.721%; +150.079%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+336.276ms; +398.307ms] or [+365.377%; +432.777%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+738.066op/s; +980.708op/s] or [+6.065%; +8.059%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+293.646ms; +344.107ms] or [+222.963%; +261.277%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+355.345ms; +431.158ms] or [+163.384%; +198.242%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-615.846op/s; -557.123op/s] or [-55.802%; -50.481%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+148.381ms; +294.714ms] or [+63.234%; +125.595%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-665.160op/s; -581.684op/s] or [-44.366%; -38.798%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+347.026ms; +357.102ms] or [+207.562%; +213.589%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-400.090op/s; -362.799op/s] or [-27.858%; -25.261%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable throughput [+5.670op/s; +122.147op/s] or [+1.058%; +22.800%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-196.129µs; -165.452µs] or [-9.935%; -8.381%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+47.190op/s; +55.887op/s] or [+9.316%; +11.033%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.378ms; +304.668ms] or [+152.776%; +153.425%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.230ms; +302.713ms] or [+150.446%; +151.690%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.989ms; +304.214ms] or [+151.204%; +152.824%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.407ms; +303.064ms] or [+151.356%; +152.189%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+295.498ms; +299.142ms] or [+146.110%; +147.912%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+305.030ms; +309.201ms] or [+154.602%; +156.717%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.879ms; +303.075ms] or [+151.014%; +152.116%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.562ms; +300.703ms] or [+148.308%; +149.873%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+50171.394op/s; +56999.838op/s] or [+9.962%; +11.318%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.094ms; +302.998ms] or [+149.294%; +150.739%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-18285.045op/s; -17081.766op/s] or [-7.353%; -6.869%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.046ms; -12.389ms] or [-7.462%; -5.761%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+12.568µs; +61.951µs] or [+3.104%; +15.302%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.179KB; -19.157KB] or [-6.996%; -6.988%]
  • unstable execution_time [-38.163µs; +17.974µs] or [-7.543%; +3.552%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-27.797KB; -27.779KB] or [-10.133%; -10.127%]
  • unstable execution_time [-77.992µs; -15.297µs] or [-13.515%; -2.651%]
  • unstable throughput [+69.712op/s; +251.300op/s] or [+3.983%; +14.357%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+7.811µs; +12.660µs] or [+18.462%; +29.924%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5469.330op/s; -3561.490op/s] or [-23.024%; -14.993%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-11.278µs; +2.484µs] or [-17.498%; +3.854%]
  • unstable throughput [+389.386op/s; +2800.737op/s] or [+2.389%; +17.183%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.956ms; +302.334ms] or [+152.120%; +152.816%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.313ms; +305.554ms] or [+154.385%; +155.526%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.311ms; +303.687ms] or [+150.843%; +152.033%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.538ms; +299.728ms] or [+148.296%; +149.387%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.492ms; +304.121ms] or [+151.395%; +152.715%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.377ms; +305.855ms] or [+153.346%; +155.110%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.297ms; +301.181ms] or [+149.790%; +150.231%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61274299.946op/s; +61626570.508op/s] or [+44.624%; +44.880%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+331.305ms; +393.198ms] or [+412.037%; +489.012%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.086ms; +300.199ms] or [+149.177%; +149.732%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+59142.923op/s; +70002.807op/s] or [+5.522%; +6.536%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+44047.959op/s; +63591.528op/s] or [+5.098%; +7.361%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+51929.407op/s; +61651.851op/s] or [+5.157%; +6.123%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+43812.976op/s; +49013.305op/s] or [+7.956%; +8.900%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+58829.632op/s; +78279.342op/s] or [+6.573%; +8.746%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

Base automatically changed from steven/codeowners-5 to master August 31, 2026 14:27
@bouwkast
bouwkast force-pushed the steven/codeowners-9 branch from d66e975 to 751017b Compare August 31, 2026 15:45
bouwkast and others added 2 commits September 1, 2026 08:39
@bouwkast
Refine listed non-IDM tests to single owner
1a65891
@bouwkast @andrewlock
Apply more CODEOWNER changes
1c89993 
Co-authored-by: Andrew Lock <andrewlock.net@gmail.com>
@bouwkast
bouwkast force-pushed the steven/codeowners-9 branch from 751017b to 1c89993 Compare September 1, 2026 12:39
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (9149) and master.

✅ No regressions detected

📄 View the full report (charts + all metrics) →

@bouwkast
bouwkast requested review from a team, link04 and vandonr and removed request for a team September 2, 2026 20:11
@bouwkast
bouwkast enabled auto-merge (squash) September 4, 2026 14:10
@bouwkast
bouwkast merged commit a700999 into master Sep 4, 2026
141 checks passed
@bouwkast
bouwkast deleted the steven/codeowners-9 branch September 4, 2026 16:28
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Sep 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@vandonr vandonr vandonr approved these changes
@andrewlock andrewlock andrewlock approved these changes
@link04 link04 link04 approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.53.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@bouwkast @vandonr @andrewlock @link04