Skip to content

ci: configure release-please for the 2.0.0 beta line - #54

Open
khvn26 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-please-config
Open

ci: configure release-please for the 2.0.0 beta line#54
khvn26 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-please-config

Conversation

@khvn26

@khvn26 khvn26 commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #45.

The release-please check on main currently reports "release-please is not configured for this repository"; once we merge this, it should go green, with a release PR proposing 2.0.0-beta.1.

Important

  • The merge commit must keep the Release-As: 2.0.0-beta.1 footer. Squash-and-merge keeps it by default for a single-commit branch — just don't edit it out of the body.
  • prerelease: true also marks the GitHub release as a prerelease, and that can't be decoupled from the versioning. GET /releases/latest skips prereleases, so Add install.sh #44's install.sh must resolve the newest tag from /releases until we're out of public beta.
  • Merge the rest of this stack before merging the release PR, so the first tag produces binaries and images too.

Flagsmith/github-webhook-handler runs release-please centrally for any repo
that has release-please-config.json and .release-please-manifest.json at its
root, so no workflow is checked in here — and a .github/workflows file whose
name contains "release-please" would opt the repo back out.

`versioning: prerelease` and `prerelease: true` are both required: the
strategy strips the -beta suffix and hands back a bare major.minor.patch
unless `prerelease` is set. Together they keep the beta line on 2.0.0-beta.N
for every commit type until we flip `prerelease` off, at which point the next
release is exactly 2.0.0.

The manifest starts at the last npm release, 1.1.0, whose tag sits on the
commit below `feat!: CLI v2` — so the first release considers exactly that
commit, and Release-As pins it to a numbered beta instead of the bare
2.0.0-beta that bumpPrerelease would produce from a version with no
prerelease digits.

beep boop

Release-As: 2.0.0-beta.1
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@khvn26, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 58 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 2d4c8a65-04e2-42cd-9f6a-ceb4df334591

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 93ecd2d and c20768b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .release-please-manifest.json
  • release-please-config.json

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@khvn26
khvn26 marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2026 10:49
@khvn26
khvn26 requested review from a team and emyller and removed request for a team July 29, 2026 12:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants