Local content discussion is missing a custom scheme section

[reynoldslabware]

1. typo "This menas"
2. Add a section on using a custom scheme and how it interacts with web resource requested etc.

---

Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

• ID: c4cd0457-26bf-0123-6f03-35bc1fd5dcdc
• Version Independent ID: c4cd0457-26bf-0123-6f03-35bc1fd5dcdc
• Content: Working with local content in WebView2 apps - Microsoft Edge Development
• Content Source: microsoft-edge/webview2/concepts/working-with-local-content.md
• Product: microsoft-edge
• Technology: webview
• GitHub Login: Microsoft Edge Team (@MSEdgeTeam)
• Microsoft Alias: msedgedevrel

AB#47199701

[captainbrosset]

Thanks for the report and request. Marking this accordingly so it can be tracked on our backlog.

[reynoldslabware]

Note that there are ripple affects when using a custom scheme.
See this discussion that I also initiated for some nuances with window.open().
MicrosoftEdge/WebView2Feedback#4085

Thanks for all the WebView2 effort. It should eliminate\replace a lot of our custom CEF1\CEF3 code.