"win" originally stood for "what if notes", because they they were notes versions of the what if book. however, over time I expect that this project will diverge from the original. what if by hernan and Robbins so we can rename it? what if? not! or what? if not? it's a joke on two levels. first, it's a nod to the fact that the key problem in the the fundamental problem of causal inference is that we can't observe the counterfactuals so half at least half of our data is always missing, at least for the outcomes. on another. in another sense, this book is not what the book. what if we can make a borat joke here? we can start the readme or the introduction saying this is a fork or a copy of the book. what if by her and robins. then leave a full screen width of blank space and then stick the meme of borat saying not. then explain why this book is not that book even though it originally was a copy outright.
"win" originally stood for "what if notes", because they they were notes versions of the what if book. however, over time I expect that this project will diverge from the original. what if by hernan and Robbins so we can rename it? what if? not! or what? if not? it's a joke on two levels. first, it's a nod to the fact that the key problem in the the fundamental problem of causal inference is that we can't observe the counterfactuals so half at least half of our data is always missing, at least for the outcomes. on another. in another sense, this book is not what the book. what if we can make a borat joke here? we can start the readme or the introduction saying this is a fork or a copy of the book. what if by her and robins. then leave a full screen width of blank space and then stick the meme of borat saying not. then explain why this book is not that book even though it originally was a copy outright.