Skip to content

waybar: refactor - #250099

Merged
AndersonTorres merged 1 commit into
NixOS:masterfrom
atorres1985-contrib:waybar
Aug 19, 2023
Merged

AndersonTorres merged 1 commit into
NixOS:masterfrom
atorres1985-contrib:waybar

Conversation

@AndersonTorres

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

- Reorder argument list
- Use rec-less, overlay-style overridable recursive attributes (in effect since
#119942);
- Use pushd/popd instead of subshell
- Use lib.mesonEnable and lib.mesonBool
- Indentation
- Remove nested `with`
@ofborg ofborg Bot added the 8.has: clean-up This PR removes packages or removes other cruft label Aug 19, 2023
@ofborg ofborg Bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Aug 19, 2023
@AndersonTorres
AndersonTorres marked this pull request as ready for review August 19, 2023 14:30
@AndersonTorres
AndersonTorres merged commit edf73b4 into NixOS:master Aug 19, 2023
@minijackson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Now, I'm a bit confused about this PR. No checkbox was ticked, so I don't know the extent of the tests you did, and it was merged only a few hours later, without any other comment by someone else.

I was planning on reviewing it when I got notified, but simply did not have the time to finish work and go home before the PR was merged. I would probably have accepted, I do like the changes, but you can guess my surprise when I found out that a package that I maintain got refactored without any approval of any of the maintainers.

@AndersonTorres

AndersonTorres commented Aug 22, 2023 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I judged the reword as mostly equivalent and needed no more than a local testing and an all-green CI.

Sorry by my haste. I was on a small hurry for merging some already approved PRs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

8.has: clean-up This PR removes packages or removes other cruft 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants