Skip to content

add CNCF footer and LF trademarks link#13

Open
cnvergence wants to merge 3 commits into
kbind-dev:mainfrom
cnvergence:add-lf-footer
Open

add CNCF footer and LF trademarks link#13
cnvergence wants to merge 3 commits into
kbind-dev:mainfrom
cnvergence:add-lf-footer

Conversation

@cnvergence

@cnvergence cnvergence commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

kbind-dev/kbind#448

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enabled the CNCF footer display.
    • Added a “Trademark Usage” link to the footer “Policies” navigation.

Signed-off-by: Karol Szwaj <karol.szwaj@gmail.com>

On-behalf-of: @SAP karol.szwaj@sap.com
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@cnvergence, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 54 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 00e1fa43-b097-4924-8ec3-91a70293672a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3a3e1a and aba0821.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • data/home/data.yaml

Walkthrough

config.toml now enables the CNCF footer display and adds a new footer policy link for “Trademark Usage” pointing to the Linux Foundation trademark-usage URL.

Changes

Footer Configuration Updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
CNCF footer flag and Trademark Usage link
config.toml
footer_cncf_show is set to true, and a new [[params.links.footer.policies.links]] entry adds “Trademark Usage” with the Linux Foundation trademark-usage URL.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Poem

🐇 I hop through the footer, both tidy and bright,
CNCF now shows up just right.
A Trademark Usage link lands in its nest,
With Linux Foundation, it’s set with the rest.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly matches the main change: enabling the CNCF footer and adding the Linux Foundation trademarks link.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

ntnn
ntnn previously approved these changes Jun 30, 2026
@ntnn ntnn added this to tbd Jun 30, 2026
@ntnn ntnn moved this to Reviewing in tbd Jun 30, 2026
mjudeikis
mjudeikis previously approved these changes Jul 1, 2026
@cnvergence cnvergence dismissed stale reviews from mjudeikis and ntnn via c3a3e1a July 1, 2026 08:08
@cnvergence cnvergence requested a review from ntnn July 1, 2026 08:09
Signed-off-by: Karol Szwaj <karol.szwaj@gmail.com>
@cnvergence cnvergence requested a review from mjudeikis July 1, 2026 08:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants