Skip to content

JIT safety is not documented #16

Description

@Shnatsel

JIT is quite perilous from the correctness and security standpoints, but this is currently not addressed in the README.

If you write an interpreter in Rust you can use rustc to guarantee memory safety, but with JIT you're essentially emitting arbitrary assembly at runtime and jumping into it. No amount of memory safety guarantees on the original code will guarantee memory safety in the generated code.

Please document how this is addressed (if at all).

P.S. Thank you for the very interesting project that's pushing the boundaries of safety as we know it!

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions