Skip to content

Cumulative hierarchy of sets cleanup - #5510

Merged
benjub merged 6 commits into
developfrom
r1fun
Sep 28, 2026
Merged

benjub merged 6 commits into
developfrom
r1fun

Conversation

@benjub

@benjub benjub commented Sep 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Some axiom savings, streamlinings, and comment edits around the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Best reviewed by commit.

Comment thread set.mm
Comment thread set.mm Outdated
Comment on lines +106080 to +106089
$( Any member of the cumulative hierarchy of sets is well-founded.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) $)
r1elwf $p |- ( A e. ( R1 ` B ) -> A e. U. ( R1 " On ) ) $=
( vx cr1 cfv wcel cv csuc con0 wrex cima cuni cdm wlim word wfun r1funlim
wss simpri wceq limord ordsson mp2b elfvdm sselid cpw wtr r1tr trss ax-mp
wi elpwg mpbird r1sucg syl eleqtrrd suceq fveq2d eleq2d rspcev rankwflemb
syl2anc sylibr ) ABDEZFZACGZHZDEZFZCIJZADIKLFVEBIFABHZDEZFZVJVEDMZIBVNNZV
NOVNIRDPVOQSVNUAVNUBUCABDUDZUEVEAVDUFZVLVEAVQFAVDRZVDUGVEVRUKBUHVDAUIUJAV
DVDULUMVEBVNFVLVQTVPBUNUOUPVIVMCBIVFBTZVHVLAVSVGVKDVFBUQURUSUTVBCAVAVC $.
( vx cr1 cfv wcel cv csuc con0 wrex cima cuni cdm wlim wss r1dmlim limord
word ordsson wceq mp2b elfvdm sselid cpw wtr r1tr trss ax-mp elpwg mpbird
r1sucg syl eleqtrrd suceq fveq2d eleq2d rspcev syl2anc rankwflemb sylibr
wi ) ABDEZFZACGZHZDEZFZCIJZADIKLFVCBIFABHZDEZFZVHVCDMZIBVLNVLRVLIOPVLQVLS
UAABDUBZUCVCAVBUDZVJVCAVNFAVBOZVBUEVCVOVABUFVBAUGUHAVBVBUIUJVCBVLFVJVNTVM
BUKULUMVGVKCBIVDBTZVFVJAVPVEVIDVDBUNUOUPUQURCAUSUT $.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe rather "Any stage of the cumulative hierarchy of sets", also here?

@benjub benjub Sep 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually that's the precise confusion I wanted to avoid by clarifying these comments: A is not a stage, but an element of one. Maybe I could write:

Any element of (any stage of) the cumulative hierarchy of sets is well-founded (recall that U. ( R1 " On ) is the class of well-founded sets).

edit: done in b53f20d

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, now I get it.
I think the comment is fine as it is now.
Maybe the explanation could come in the definition of R1, or in r1val:

In the following, we call ( R1 ` A ) a stage of the cumulative hierarchy of sets.

@benjub benjub Sep 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done in
35a2b7d
0978513

@benjub benjub mentioned this pull request Sep 27, 2026
@benjub
benjub requested a review from tirix September 28, 2026 16:29
@benjub
benjub merged commit 0bbe482 into develop Sep 28, 2026
20 checks passed
@benjub
benjub deleted the r1fun branch September 28, 2026 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants