Skip to content

docs: all Form Field Label stories specs and testcases - #1325

Draft
eslook wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
docs/form-field-label-stories-specs-testcases
Draft

eslook wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
docs/form-field-label-stories-specs-testcases

Conversation

@eslook

@eslook eslook commented Aug 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Onderdeel van #995 en #994

Bevat alle stories, test stories, evil stories en tests voor de component. In de GitHub Pull Request werken we samen om deze in te vullen en vervolgens te reviewen. Deze zijn dummycode, zodat ze voorbereid zijn om in de
Ontwikkelfase daadwerkelijk uitgewerkt te krijgen.


Voor reviewers:

We verzamelen nu specifiek feedback op de stories in de storybestanden, de tests mag je buiten beschouwing laten.

  • De naam: Is die beschrijvend genoeg?
  • De beschrijving: Begrijp je het? Is het te technisch? Of mis je juist informatie nu? Vind je het taalgebruik toegankelijk voor iedereen?
  • Mis je stories?

Reviews zijn al uitgevoerd door:

  • toegankelijkheidsexpert
  • designer woensdag (jeff)
  • designer donderdag (roos)
  • developer (algemeen)
  • developer (ontwikkelfase)

Ready voor Ontwikkelfase developer; alles duidelijk om te bouwen

  • Ja, is gecontroleerd en geOK'd

Ready voor Design System Lead?

  • Ja
  • Nee, nog niet

@eslook
eslook requested a review from a team as a code owner August 11, 2026 13:38
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
candidate Ready Ready Preview Sep 25, 2026 1:53pm UTC
candidate-storybook-non-conforming Ready Ready Preview Sep 25, 2026 1:53pm UTC
candidate-storybook-test Ready Ready Preview Sep 25, 2026 1:53pm UTC

Request Review

@eslook
eslook marked this pull request as draft August 11, 2026 13:38
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
33.8% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@eslook eslook changed the title docs: add all stories specs and testcases for draft PR docs: form field label - add all stories specs and testcases Aug 11, 2026
@eslook eslook changed the title docs: form field label - add all stories specs and testcases docs: form field label - all dummy stories specs and testcases Aug 11, 2026
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
Comment thread packages/storybook-non-conforming/stories/form-field-label.stories.tsx Outdated
eslook and others added 3 commits September 24, 2026 15:03
Co-authored-by: Renate Roke <94439479+RenateRoke@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Renate Roke <94439479+RenateRoke@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Lauwers <jeffreylauwers@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rozerin <84851545+Rozerinay@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Renate Roke <94439479+RenateRoke@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Renate Roke <94439479+RenateRoke@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rozerin <84851545+Rozerinay@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlotte <42849307+eslook@users.noreply.github.com>
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (758d0a0) to head (0cc0ae5).
⚠️ Report is 140 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1325   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           18        20    +2     
  Lines          138       146    +8     
  Branches        30        30           
=========================================
+ Hits           138       146    +8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This branch was successfully deployed

3 active deployments
Preview – candidate — 0cc0ae5f Deployed Sep 25, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – candidate-storybook-test — 0cc0ae5f Deployed Sep 25, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – candidate-storybook-non-conforming — 0cc0ae5f Deployed Sep 25, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants