Repository navigation
Conversation
uci reviewed its pull requests with the legacy ai-review workflow at v0.0.22, while every repository that calls seidroid-review moved to it. seidroid.yml calls seidroid-review.yml at v0.0.26, the same way sei-internal-skills does. The pin is a released commit, so a pull request that changes the review workflow is reviewed by the last release. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
PR SummaryLow Risk Overview
Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 4211d74. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using default effort and found 3 potential issues.
❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.
Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit b9accf6. Configure here.
…assistant The caller now also listens for pull_request_review_comment and pull_request_review, as the retired ai-review caller did. The close job fires only on a comment that starts with the close command, so a review comment that quotes it later runs neither job. ai-assist.yml moves from v0.0.22 to v0.0.26, which no longer answers `@seidroid review close`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Summary
Reviews uci's own pull requests with seidroid, and retires the legacy
ai-reviewcaller. Every other repository that callsseidroid-review.ymlalready uses it; uci was still onai-review.ymlat v0.0.22.Blocked on one secret: uci needs
OMNIGENT_MACHINE_CLIENT_SECRETas a repository or organization secret. This PR's own run confirms it: the Guard job stops withOMNIGENT_MACHINE_CLIENT_SECRET is not set on the calling repository. The App secretsPLATFORM_CODE_AGENT_APP_IDand_PKare already visible to uci. This PR stays a draft until the secret exists.Change
seidroid.yml(new), modelled on sei-chain's caller and pinned to v0.0.26 (0dc48cf):@seidroid reviewin a top-level comment, an inline comment or a review body.@seidroid review close. A comment that starts with the review command and quotes the close command later runs neither job, so nothing is destroyed. Closing the PR reclaims the session.ai-assist.yml: v0.0.22 → v0.0.26, so the assistant no longer answers@seidroid review close(fix(ai-assistant): reserve@seidroid review closefor the review workflow #117).ai-review-self.yml: deleted.The pin is a released commit, not
./. A pull request that changesseidroid-review.ymlis therefore reviewed by the last release, so a broken change cannot disable its own review.approve-on-success: truematches the sibling repositories. uci'smainhas no branch protection and its one ruleset is disabled, so a bot approval satisfies no rule. uci has noREVIEW.md, so the reviewer uses the driver's own checklist; the workflow logs a warning for the missing file.Verification
actionlinton both files: clean.reviewfrom all three surfaces, a top-level close command reachesclose, and a review comment that quotes the close command reaches neither.After the secret is added,
@seidroid reviewon this PR is the end-to-end check.🤖 Generated with Claude Code