You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 25, 2026. It is now read-only.
This proposal adds a second… operand(?) to the import(...) expression, an options bag. As I understand it, it is meant to be an extensible mechanism that other language enhancements that modify the importing process may take advantage of.
As currently specified, EvaluateImportCall is defined to ignore the presence of unrecognized keys in the options bag. As far as this proposal is concerned, this is fine, because assertions are meant to be applied opportunistically, and if they pass, they don’t change the semantics of importing; however, there are already proposals in the works building upon this one that do. For example, https://github.com/tc39/proposal-import-reflection may import the module as an entirely different object.
My question is, how is user code to know whether an import option was actually taken into account by the host? How should it prevent a situation where an import call ostensibly returns success, but with the wrong semantics? (e.g. importing a JSON file as if it were an ECMAScript module)
This proposal adds a second… operand(?) to the
import(...)expression, an options bag. As I understand it, it is meant to be an extensible mechanism that other language enhancements that modify the importing process may take advantage of.As currently specified, EvaluateImportCall is defined to ignore the presence of unrecognized keys in the options bag. As far as this proposal is concerned, this is fine, because assertions are meant to be applied opportunistically, and if they pass, they don’t change the semantics of importing; however, there are already proposals in the works building upon this one that do. For example, https://github.com/tc39/proposal-import-reflection may import the module as an entirely different object.
My question is, how is user code to know whether an import option was actually taken into account by the host? How should it prevent a situation where an
importcall ostensibly returns success, but with the wrong semantics? (e.g. importing a JSON file as if it were an ECMAScript module)